答题卡报告

{"status":"success","code":200,"message":"","data":{"id":4,"name":"","biz_id":3620,"biz_type":"chapter","status":"finished","total_score":12,"score":0,"time":"23时42分04秒","total_num":10,"right_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"path":"/pages/question/random","questions":[{"id":85466,"type":"single_choice","num":1,"index":1,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2016/2/4）下列与不作为犯罪相关的表述，哪一选项是正确的？","category_id":"3624","level":"difficulty","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"C","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":209,"tag":"A","title":"甲警察接到报案：有歹徒正在杀害其妻。甲立即前往现场，但只是站在现场观看，没有采取任何措施。此时，县卫生局副局长刘某路过现场，也未救助被害妇女。结果，歹徒杀害了其妻。甲和刘某都是国家机关工作人员，都没有履行救助义务，均应成立渎职罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":210,"tag":"B","title":"甲非常讨厌其侄子乙（6岁）。某日，甲携乙外出时，张三酒后驾车撞伤了乙并迅速逃逸。乙躺在血泊中。甲心想，反正事故不是自己造成的，于是离开了现场。乙因得不到救助而死亡。由于张三负有救助义务，所以甲不构成不作为犯罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":211,"tag":"C","title":"甲下班回家后，发现自家门前放着一包来历不明、类似面粉的东西。甲第二天上班时拿到实验室化验，发现是海洛因，于是立即倒入厕所马桶冲入下水道。甲虽然没有将毒品上交公安部门，但不构成非法持有毒品罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":212,"tag":"D","title":"《消防法》规定，任何人发现火灾都必须立即报警。过路人甲发现火灾后没有及时报警，导致火灾蔓延。甲的行为成立不作为的放火罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"本题考查不作为犯，涉及作为义务的来源、持有行为的定性、不作为犯罪的成立与构成要件等诸多问题。A选项，考查职务业务引起的作为义务。（1）甲具有双重身份：作为警察有职务上的救助危难的义务，故意不救助而造成损失，根据《刑法》第397条，可构成滥用职权罪（渎职罪）。作为丈夫有救助妻子的义务，如果在当时的场景下，甲一救助则妻子有极大可能脱险避免死亡，则其不作为行为与杀人的作为行为有等价性，此时，甲故意不救助，根据《刑法》第232条，可构成不作为故意杀人罪。系想象竞合，应当择一重处。（2）对于刘某的行为，虽为国家机关工作人员，但依其职务（卫生局副局长），其具体职责中没有救助危难的作为义务，不构成不作为犯，只是违纪或违反道德的行为。B选项，考查作为义务的来源。（1）叔叔与侄子之间，不存在民法、婚姻家庭法上规定的救助义务。（2）乙受伤的风险系张三创设，甲不存在因先前创设风险行为而产生的救助义务。（3）甲携6岁儿童乙外出的法律行为，会产生临时监护义务（保护人身份），包括被监护人因他人、本人、监护人而陷于危险时的救助义务。故甲具有因法律行为（自愿接受为临时保护人的单方法律行为）而引起的保护义务。C选项，（1）持有行为一般认为是作为行为，而不是不作为行为。（2）本选项中行为人在持有时并不明知毒品，而明知后又不再持有。因行为人并不具有上缴毒品的义务，不上缴不构成不作为行为。（3）明知是毒品后而不持有，没有实施作为行为，又不属不作为，不构成犯罪。D选项，考查法律、法规规定的义务，与不作为犯罪的关系。根据《消防法》的规定，公民发现火情后有报警义务；但此义务为行政法义务。但是，由于刑法上没有规定对应的“不报警”犯罪，故而甲只是行政法上的不作为，而不是刑法上的不作为犯罪。此外，火灾结果与不报警行为也无刑法上的因果关系，故不成立不作为的放火罪。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85507,"type":"single_choice","num":2,"index":2,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2007/2/14）张某和赵某长期一起赌博，某日两人在工地发生争执，张某推了赵某一把，赵某倒地后后脑勺正好碰到石头上，导致颅脑损伤，经抢救无效死亡。关于张某的行为，下列哪一选项是正确的？","category_id":"3625","level":"simple","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"B","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":373,"tag":"A","title":"构成故意杀人罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":374,"tag":"B","title":"构成过失致人死亡罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":375,"tag":"C","title":"构成故意伤害罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":376,"tag":"D","title":"属于意外事件","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"本题考查疏忽大意过失与意外事件的区分。（1）按平常之理推导，行为人对被害人实施推搡行为时，没想到会致死致伤，对被害人的死亡结果、伤害结果没有预见到，不能认为有伤害或杀人故意。（2）问题在于，张某是否有过失（疏忽大意的过失），这涉及疏忽大意的过失与意外事件的区分。依题意，推搡的行为发生在“工地”，一般人可以预见地形复杂危险环境而造成危险的后果，而张某未预见，属应当预见而未预见，系疏忽大意的过失，应认定为过失致人死亡罪，而非意外事件。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85525,"type":"single_choice","num":3,"index":3,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2003/2/1）养花专业户李某为防止偷花，在花房周围私拉电网。一日晚，白某偷花不慎触电，经送医院抢救，不治身亡。李某对这种结果的主观心理态度是什么？","category_id":"3626","level":"simple","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"B","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":445,"tag":"A","title":"直接故意","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":446,"tag":"B","title":"间接故意","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":447,"tag":"C","title":"过于自信的过失","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":448,"tag":"D","title":"疏忽大意的过失","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"表面上考查间接故意与过失区分，实际上涉及正当防卫中时间条件、限度条件，以及防卫过当中过错的认定。（1）客观不法积极层面上，李某拉电网致白某被电死，系致人死亡的行为。（2）在不法消极层面即违法阻却事由上，李某系预先设立防卫装置，电网发挥作用时盗窃不法侵害正在进行，符合防卫起因、时间、对象条件；但以致死防卫盗窃，超过必要限度，不属正当防卫，系防卫过当，是不法行为。（3）在主观罪过方面，防卫过当一般是过失犯罪，也可能是故意犯罪。防卫过当中的罪过不是指对事实结果的心态，而是对过当结果的心态。对于构成要件事实，李某明知电网造成他人死亡的可能性极大，虽无追求死亡结果的意志，客观上也没有采取防范措施，没有防止结果发生的客观依据或客观经验证据。对于死亡结果发生的事实应为间接故意（构成要件故意），而不属过于自信的过失。（4）对于违法阻却事由的主观心态，李某拉电网的意图是防卫盗窃，具有防卫意图；但对于致死结果即防卫过当的不法事实仍有认识，只不过不予追求；对于过当结果即不法事实亦为间接故意（责任故意）。亦即，明知过当而放任为之。（5）客观主观相统一，根据《刑法》第232条，构成故意杀人罪；根据第20条第2款，应属防卫过当，应当减轻或者免除处罚。（6）客观上，如果本题再写明李某私拉电网的地点“花房周围”是公共场所，具有危害公共安全的危险，则其客观上有以危险方法危害公共安全的行为；主观上对此危险明知但不追求，对公共安全危险系间接故意，根据《刑法》第114条，可触犯以危险方法危害公共安全罪。公共安全不是防卫对象，对此对象不存在防卫问题。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85609,"type":"single_choice","num":4,"index":4,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2005/2/8）根据我国刑法规定，下列关于首要分子的表述哪一项是正确的？","category_id":"3628","level":"simple","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"D","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":781,"tag":"A","title":"首要分子只能是组织领导犯罪集团的人","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":782,"tag":"B","title":"首要分子只能是在聚众犯罪中起组织、策划、指挥作用的犯罪分子","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":783,"tag":"C","title":"首要分子都是主犯","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":784,"tag":"D","title":"首要分子既可以是主犯，也可以不是主犯","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"首要分子分为两类：（1）犯罪集团中的首要分子，必定为主犯；（2）聚众犯罪中的首要分子，又分为：可成立共同犯罪的聚众犯罪中首要分子，必定也是主犯；不能成立共同犯罪的聚众犯罪中首要分子，可能是单独犯而不涉及主犯的问题。选项A错误，因为首要分子还有聚众犯罪这种情况。选项B错误，犯罪集团中也有首要分子。选项C错误，对于只处罚首要分子的聚众犯罪（如聚众扰乱公共场所秩序、交通秩序罪，聚众阻碍解救被收买的妇女、儿童罪）中首要分子，如果这种聚众犯罪中的首要分子仅一人，就没有共同犯罪问题，是单独犯。如果这种聚众犯罪中的首要分子是数人，可以区分主从关系的，既有主犯也有从犯。选项D正确，见选项C解析后半段。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85613,"type":"single_choice","num":5,"index":5,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"(2008/2/7）甲、乙夫妇因8岁的儿子严重残疾，生活完全不能自理而非常痛苦。一天，甲给儿子要喝的牛奶里放入“毒鼠强”时被乙看到，乙说：“这是毒药吧，你给他喝呀？”见甲不说话，乙叹了口气后就走开了。毒死儿子后，甲、乙二人一起掩埋尸体并对外人说儿子因病而死。关于甲、乙行为的定性，下列哪一选项是正确的？","category_id":"3628","level":"normal","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"A","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":797,"tag":"A","title":"甲与乙构成故意杀人的共同犯罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":798,"tag":"B","title":"甲构成故意杀人罪，乙构成包庇罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":799,"tag":"C","title":"甲构成故意杀人罪，乙构成遗弃罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":800,"tag":"D","title":"甲构成故意杀人罪，乙无罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"本题考查共同犯罪与不作为。正犯甲是作为的故意杀人罪，这较好认定。对于乙的行为性质的认定，涉及三个问题：（1）乙对儿子的死亡能否构成不作为犯？乙是其子的父母，依法具有保护其人身的法定作为义务，能够履行而不履行，造成结果，符合不作为犯的客观条件。（2）乙不救助的行为能否认定为“杀人”行为，以故意杀人罪定罪？首先考查乙的不救助行为能否被认定为“杀人”行为？在当时的情况下，乙如果其阻止，则死亡结果极大可能不发生；不阻止则必死无疑。不阻止的不作为行为，支配着死亡结果，与一般杀人行为性质相当，可以认定为“杀人”行为。主观上，乙对儿子死亡的心态，明知自己的不作为必然导致死亡结果而拒不履行作为义务，系故意。可构成故意杀人罪。只有乙阻止后，死亡结果也不太可能被避免，乙的不作为行为不能支配死亡结果时，才能认定为遗弃行为，本案情况不是如此，故乙不能构成遗弃罪。（3）甲、乙二人可否构成共同犯罪？杀害儿子的直接实行者是甲，但是，负有救助义务的乙如果救助，则儿子不死亡的可能性极大。也就是说，是甲（作为）、乙（不作为）两行为结合起来才导致了死亡结果，甲、乙的行为对于死亡结果具有共同性，应可认为是共同行为。乙虽无与甲共同实施犯罪的明示故意，但其以不作为的默示形式参与，至少可认为是片面的帮助犯（承认片面的帮助犯是共同犯罪）。（4）由此，甲、乙可构成共同犯罪，甲是作为的实行犯；乙是不作为的帮助犯，罪名应认定为故意杀人罪。（5）之后的掩埋尸体行为，由于是本犯实施，对共犯人进行包庇，欠缺期待可能，不能构成包庇罪或帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪。从而选项A正确，B、C、D错误。（6）为何不认为乙与甲是共同正犯呢？这就涉及乙的行为是正犯还是共犯的判断。根据通说观点（采西田典之的观点），如不作为者实施作为，本应“确实地”（具有“十之八九”的可能）避免结果发生之时，属于不作为形式的同时正犯；如果只是“有可能使得结果的发生更为困难”，则属于不作为形式的帮助犯。本案应属后者。到底还是甲的作为行为导致了儿子的死亡，乙能阻止时不阻止，其对死亡结果的作用是次要的。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85726,"type":"single_choice","num":6,"index":6,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2002/02/11）某国家机关工作人员甲借到M国探亲的机会滞留不归。一年后甲受雇于N国的一个专门收集有关中国军事情报的间谍组织，随后受该组织的指派潜回中国，找到其在某军区参谋部工作的战友乙，以1万美元的价格从乙手中购买了3份军事机密材料。对甲的行为应如何处理？","category_id":"3635","level":"difficulty","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"C","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":1249,"tag":"A","title":"以叛逃罪论处","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1250,"tag":"B","title":"以叛逃罪和间谍罪论处","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1251,"tag":"C","title":"以间谍罪论处","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":1252,"tag":"D","title":"以非法获取军事秘密罪论处","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"(1)《刑法》第109条叛逃罪的构成要求发生在“履行公务期间”，甲系到外国探亲时滞留不归，不符合此要求，不构成叛逃罪。（2）参加间谍组织，触犯《刑法》第110条规定的间谍罪。（3）参加间谍组织后受指派搜集情报，根据《刑法》第111条，又触犯为境外收买国家秘密情报罪。（4）在罪数上，间谍罪与为境外收买国家秘密情报罪，是整体法与部分法的法条竞合关系，应以整体法间谍罪一罪论处。（5)《刑法》第431条规定非法获取军事秘密罪属于军人违反职责罪中的犯罪，主体身份要求是军人，甲不具有军人身份，不能构成该罪。（6）即使甲是军人，加入间谍组织后非法获取军事秘密罪的，因此行为是间谍行为的组成部分，不再单独定罪，也只应认定为间谍罪一罪。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85727,"type":"single_choice","num":7,"index":7,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2009/02/13）某国间谍戴某，结识了我国某国家机关要员黄某。戴某谎称来华投资建厂需了解政策动向，让黄某借工作之便为其搞到密级为“机密”的《内参报告》4份。戴某拿到文件后送给黄某一部手机，并为其子前往某国留学提供了6万元资金。对黄某的行为如何定罪处罚？","category_id":"3635","level":"difficulty","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"B","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":1253,"tag":"A","title":"资助危害国家安全犯罪活动罪、非法获取国家秘密罪，数罪并罚","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1254,"tag":"B","title":"为境外窃取、刺探、收买、非法提供国家秘密、情报罪与受贿罪，数罪并罚","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":1255,"tag":"C","title":"非法获取国家秘密罪、受贿罪，数罪并罚","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1256,"tag":"D","title":"故意泄露国家秘密罪、受贿罪，从一重罪处断","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"(1）黄某客观上实施了为境外间谍人员非法提供国家秘密的行为。主观上未认识到对象人是间谍组织或代理人的任务，欠缺间谍罪故意，不能构成间谍罪。（2）黄某利用熟悉环境的便利非法获取国家（“借工作之便为其搞到”），根据《刑法》第282条第1款，触犯非法获取国家秘密罪。（3）将国家秘密泄露给他人，根据《刑法》第398条，触犯故意泄露国家秘密罪。（4）客观上为境外间谍人员窃取、刺探、非法提供国家秘密，主观上明知对象人为境外人员还为其提供国家秘密，具有为境外非法提供国家秘密的故意，根据《刑法》第111条，触犯为境外窃取、刺探、非法提供国家秘密罪。（5）作为国家工作人员利用职务上的便利，收受手机和钱款，为他人谋取利益的，根据《刑法》第385条，触犯受贿罪。（6）在罪数上，为境外窃取、刺探、非法提供国家秘密罪，与非法获取国家秘密罪、故意泄露国家秘密罪之间，存在整体法与部分法的法条竞合关系，应以整体法为境外窃取、刺探、非法提供国家秘密罪论处。（7）受贿后利用职务便利为他人谋取利益，谋利行为本身构成他罪，不是“伪造后诈骗”的模型，不成立牵连犯。除刑法明文规定择一重处以外，都应数罪并罚。故选B项。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85752,"type":"single_choice","num":8,"index":8,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2006/02/11）甲系某公司经理，乙是其司机。某日，乙开车送甲去洽谈商务，途中因违章超速行驶当场将行人丙撞死，并致行人丁重伤。乙欲送丁去医院救治，被甲阻止。甲催乙送其前去洽谈商务，并称否则会造成重大经济损失。于是，乙打电话给120急救站后离开肇事现场。但因时间延误，丁不治身亡。关于本案，下列哪一选项是正确的？","category_id":"3636","level":"normal","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"B","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":1353,"tag":"A","title":"甲不构成犯罪，乙构成交通肇事罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1354,"tag":"B","title":"甲、乙均构成交通肇事罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":1355,"tag":"C","title":"乙构成交通肇事罪和不作为的故意杀人罪，甲是不作为的故意杀人罪的共犯","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1356,"tag":"D","title":"甲、乙均构成故意杀人罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"在交通肇事后为逃避法律追究而逃跑，属于“逃逸”。（1）对于司机乙，交通肇事后逃逸，导致被害人得不到救治而死亡，构成交通肇事罪“因逃逸致人死亡”。（2）对于经理甲，根据《最高人民法院关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第5条第2款的规定，属交通肇事后，单位主管人员指使肇事人逃逸，致使被害人因得不到救助而死亡，以交通肇事罪的“共犯”（共同过失犯罪）论处。故而，B选项正确。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85862,"type":"single_choice","num":9,"index":9,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"（2013/02/16）关于侮辱罪与诽谤罪的论述，下列哪一选项是正确的？","category_id":"3638","level":"simple","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"B","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":1793,"tag":"A","title":"为寻求刺激在车站扒光妇女衣服，引起他人围观的，触犯强制猥亵、侮辱妇女罪（现为强制猥亵、侮辱罪），未触犯侮辱罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1794,"tag":"B","title":"为报复妇女，在大街上边打妇女边骂“狐狸精”，情节严重的，应以侮辱罪论处，不以诽谤罪论处","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":1795,"tag":"C","title":"捏造他人强奸妇女的犯罪事实，向公安局和媒体告发，意图使他人受刑事追究，情节严重的，触犯诬告陷害罪，未触犯诽谤罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":1796,"tag":"D","title":"侮辱罪、诽谤罪属于亲告罪，未经当事人告诉，一律不得追究被告人的刑事责任","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"A选项，扒光妇女衣服，侵害他人性尊严，无论有无“满足自己变态性刺激”的特定倾向或动机，都成立强制猥亵、侮辱罪。由此手段贬损他人名誉，也触犯了侮辱罪。系想象竞合，因二罪法定刑相同，而强制猥亵、侮辱罪更为特殊，最终强制猥亵、侮辱罪定罪处罚。“未触犯侮辱罪”说法不当。B选项，骂“狐狸精”是辱骂，不是捏造事实，只构成侮辱罪，不构成诽谤罪。C选项，同时触犯两罪，由于是分别向公安局和媒体告发，是两行为不是一行为，不是想象竞合犯，可构成两罪，应当数罪并罚。“未触犯诽谤罪”说法不当。D选项，侮辱罪、诽谤罪，一般情况亲告；严重危害社会秩序和国家利益的，无需亲告。“一律”二字有误。","audio":null,"video":null}},{"id":85992,"type":"single_choice","num":10,"index":10,"year":null,"score":0,"title":"律师王某在代理一起民事诉讼案件时，编造了一份对自己代理的一方当事人有利的虚假证言，指使证人李某背熟以后向法庭陈述，致使本该败诉的己方当事人因此而胜诉。王某的行为构成何罪？（2003/02/11）","category_id":"3640","level":"normal","status":"empty","is_answer":true,"user_answer":"","answer":"C","right_num":0,"total_num":0,"wrong_num":0,"user_right_num":0,"user_total_num":0,"user_wrong_num":0,"user_rate":0,"rate":0,"start_time":0,"end_time":0,"time":0,"collect":false,"options":[{"id":2314,"tag":"A","title":"伪证罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":2315,"tag":"B","title":"诉讼代理人妨害作证罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""},{"id":2316,"tag":"C","title":"妨害作证罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":true,"user_status":"right","status":""},{"id":2317,"tag":"D","title":"帮助伪造证据罪","num":0,"rate":0,"is_success":false,"user_status":"","status":""}],"analyse":{"content":"(1）本案发生在民事诉讼中，故王某不构成诉讼代理人妨害作证罪，也不构成伪证罪，这两罪只发生在刑事诉讼中。故AB项不选。（2）帮助伪造证据罪中的证据一般指实物证据，故不构成帮助伪造证据罪。故D项不选。（3）王某编造虚假证言是教唆、指使证人违背事实作伪证的方式，其行为构成妨害作证罪。故选C项。","audio":null,"video":null}}],"created_at":"2025-03-06"},"error":{}}