批阅回调

curl --location --request POST 'https://jinti.shifaedu.com/api/ai/question/callback' \
--header 'Miniprogram;' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{
    "user_answer_id": 81,
    "ask_records": [
        {
            "ask_record_id": 103,
            "review": "回答基本正确，准确区分了传唤与拘传的适用对象、强制力和法律文书要求。结合案例分析较为恰当，但在表述上可以更加简洁明确。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 104,
            "review": "对普通程序与简易程序的区别掌握较好，从审判组织、审理期限、审理程序三个方面进行了对比。转换程序的合理性分析正确。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 105,
            "review": "对'\''先刑后民'\''原则的注意事项回答完整，涵盖了审理顺序、审判组织、保全措施、事实认定一致性等要点。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 106,
            "review": "分析思路清晰，从案件复杂性、审判效率、事实查明等角度论证分案审理的不当性。理由充分，逻辑严密。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 107,
            "review": "对执法记录仪视频证据性质的认定分析准确，能够区分视听资料与被告人供述的不同证明目的，法理依据充分。",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 108,
            "review": "对传闻证据的判断标准理解正确，结合案例分析侦查人员证言的性质准确，区分了证人身份与侦查人员身份。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 109,
            "review": "对认罪认罚制度的适用条件掌握准确，引用相关司法解释条款恰当，分析部分认罪情况下的处理原则正确。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 110,
            "review": "对附带民事诉讼的赔偿范围理解基本正确，但对死亡赔偿金和精神损害赔偿的具体规定表述可以更加精确。",
            "status": "right",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 111,
            "review": "对年龄认定的证据要求和'\''疑罪从无'\''原则的适用分析正确，引用司法解释条款准确，结论合理。",
            "status": "wrong",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 112,
            "review": "对证据标准的理解准确，'\''事实清楚，证据确实充分，排除合理怀疑'\''的适用正确，因果关系分析合理。",
            "status": "wrong",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 113,
            "review": "对二审程序的审查范围和处理方式掌握较好，注意到上诉不加刑原则，分析全面。",
            "status": "wrong",
            "user_score": 5
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 114,
            "review": "当事人识别准确，原告、被告、第三人的确定理由充分，符合行政诉讼法相关规定。",
            "status": "wrong",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 115,
            "review": "管辖法院的确定正确，复议维持案件的级别管辖和地域管辖规则运用准确。",
            "status": "wrong",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 116,
            "review": "起诉期限的计算正确，对未告知起诉期限情况下的期限计算规则掌握准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 117,
            "review": "对行政行为性质的认定基本正确，识别为行政许可的撤回。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 118,
            "review": "程序违法的认定正确，听证程序的要求掌握准确，分析合理。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 119,
            "review": "裁判方式的选择合理，区分原行政行为和复议决定的不同处理方式，考虑到社会公共利益因素。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 2
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 120,
            "review": "级别管辖的确定正确，县级政府为被告的案件由中级法院管辖的规定运用准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 121,
            "review": "起诉期限的计算正确，履行法定职责类案件的起诉期限规则掌握准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 122,
            "review": "被告的确定正确，'\''谁行为，谁被告'\''原则运用准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 123,
            "review": "对生态补偿制度的理解基本正确，但分析可以更深入，涉及受益者付费原则。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 124,
            "review": "补偿请求的合理性分析正确，信赖利益保护原则的适用恰当。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 125,
            "review": "判决方式选择合理，考虑到行政机关的裁量权和调查权。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 126,
            "review": "原告资格的认定正确，行政协议相对人的诉讼主体资格分析准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 127,
            "review": "被告确定正确，委托与授权的区分准确，假授权真委托的识别到位。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 128,
            "review": "行政协议性质的认定正确，符合行政协议的构成要件。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 129,
            "review": "仲裁条款效力的分析正确，行政协议中仲裁条款无效的规定掌握准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 130,
            "review": "起诉期限的确定正确，行政协议案件诉讼时效的适用规则掌握准确。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        },
        {
            "ask_record_id": 131,
            "review": "政府信息公开的分析较为全面，但对隐私保护与公共利益平衡的分析可以更加深入。",
            "status": "empty",
            "user_score": 4
        }
    ]
}'